日本天堂一区,天天色图综合网,精品久久蜜桃,亚洲国产97在线精品一区

Criterion 6: 

The person's authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in professional or major trade publications or other major media.

First, USCIS determines whether the person has authored scholarly articles in the field.

As defined in the academic arena, a scholarly article reports on original research, experimentation, or philosophical discourse. It is written by a researcher or expert in the field who is often affiliated with a college, university, or research institution. Scholarly articles are also generally peer reviewed by other experts in the field of specialization. In general, it should have footnotes, endnotes, or a bibliography, and may include graphs, charts, videos, or pictures as illustrations of the concepts expressed in the article.

Examples of scholarly article authorship include, but are not limited to:

Publications in professionally-relevant peer-reviewed journals; and

Published conference presentations at nationally or internationally recognized conferences.

For other fields, a scholarly article should be written for learned persons in that field. ("Learned" is defined as "having profound knowledge gained by study").Learned persons include all persons having profound knowledge of a field.

Second, USCIS determines whether the publication qualifies as a professional publication, major trade publication, or major media publication.

In evaluating whether a submitted publication is a professional publication or major media, relevant factors include the intended audience (for professional journals) and the circulation or readership relative to other media in the field (for major media).

標準 6：

此人在專業或主要行業出版物或其他主要媒體上發表過該領域的學術文章。

首先，移民局要確定申請人是否撰寫過該領域的學術文章。

根據學術領域的定義，學術文章是關于原創研究、實驗或哲學論述的報告。文章由該領域的研究人員或專家撰寫，他們通常隸屬于學院、大學或研究機構。學術文章一般也由專業領域的其他專家進行同行評審。一般來說，文章應該有腳注、尾注或參考書目，并可能包括圖表、視頻或圖片，作為文章中概念的說明。

學術文章作者資格的例子包括但不限于：

在專業相關的同行評審期刊上發表文章；以及

在國內或國際知名會議上發表的會議演講。

對于其他領域，學術文章應為該領域的有識之士撰寫。(博學 "的定義是 "通過學習獲得淵博的知識"）博學者包括所有在某一領域具有淵博知識的人。

其次，移民局確定出版物是否符合專業出版物、主要貿易出版物或主要媒體出版物的條件。

在評估所提交的出版物是否為專業出版物或主要媒體時，相關因素包括目標受眾（對于專業期刊）以及相對于該領域其他媒體的發行量或讀者群（對于主要媒體）。

Criterion 7: 

Display of the person's work in the field at artistic exhibitions or showcases.

First, USCIS determines whether the work that was displayed is the person's work product.

The description of this type of evidence in the regulation provides that the work must be the person's work product.

Second, USCIS determines whether the venues (virtual or otherwise) where the person's work was displayed were artistic exhibitions or showcases. Merriam-Webster's online dictionary defines exhibition as a public showing (as of works of art, objects of manufacture, or athletic skill).

標準 7：

在藝術展覽或展示會上展示個人作品。

首先，移民局要確定展示的作品是否是當事人的工作成果。

條例中對此類證據的描述規定，作品必須是當事人的工作成果。

其次，移民局確定展示該人作品的場所（虛擬或其他）是否為藝術展覽或陳列館。梅里亞姆-韋伯斯特在線詞典將展覽定義為公開展示（如藝術作品、制造物品或運動技能）。

Criterion 8: 

The person has performed in a leading or critical role for organizations or establishments that have a distinguished reputation.

First, USCIS determines whether the person has performed in a leading or critical role for an organization, establishment, or a division or department of an organization or establishment.

Examples of lead or critical roles may include, but are not limited to:

Senior faculty or senior research position for a distinguished academic department or program;

Senior research position for a distinguished non-academic institution or company;

Principal or named investigator for a department, institution, or business that received a merit-based government award, such as an academic research or Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant;

Member of a key committee within a distinguished organization;

Founder or co-founder of, or contributor of intellectual property to, a startup business that has a distinguished reputation; and

Leading or critical role for a distinguished organization or a distinguished division of an institution or company, as explained in detail by the director or a principal investigator of the relevant organization or division.

Considerations:

In evaluating such evidence, officers examine whether the role is (or was) leading or critical.

For a leading role, officers look at whether the evidence establishes that the person is (or was) a leader within the organization or establishment or a division or department thereof. A title, with appropriate matching duties, can help to establish that a role is (or was), in fact, leading.

For a critical role, officers look at whether the evidence establishes that the person has contributed in a way that is of significant importance to the outcome of the organization or establishment's activities or those of a division or department of the organization or establishment.

A supporting role may be considered critical if the person's performance in the role is (or was) important. It is not the title of the person's role, but rather the person's performance in the role that determines whether the role is (or was) critical.

This is one criterion where letters from persons with personal knowledge of the significance of the person's leading or critical role can be particularly helpful to officers in making this determination, so long as the letters contain detailed and probative information that specifically addresses how the person's role for the organization, establishment, division, or department was leading or critical. Evidence of experience must consist of letters from employers.

Second, USCIS determines whether the organization or establishment, or the department or division for which the person holds or held a leading or critical role, has a distinguished reputation.

The relative size or longevity of an organization or establishment is not in and of itself a determining factor but is considered together with other information to determine whether a distinguished reputation exists. Other relevant factors for evaluating the reputation of an organization or establishment can include the scale of its customer base or relevant media coverage.

For academic departments, programs, and institutions, officers may also consider relevant and credible national rankings and receipt of government research grants as positive factors.

For a startup business, officers may consider evidence that the business has received significant funding from government entities, venture capital funds, angel investors, or other such funders commensurate with funding rounds generally achieved for that startup’s stage and industry, as a positive factor regarding its distinguished reputation.

Merriam-Webster's online dictionary defines “distinguished” as “marked by eminence, distinction, or excellence” or “befitting an eminent person.”

標準 8：

此人曾在聲譽卓著的組織或機構中擔任領導或關鍵職務。

首先，美國公民與移民服務局（USCIS）會確定申請人是否曾在某個組織、機構或某個組織或機構的某個部門擔任領導或關鍵職務。

領導或關鍵職位的例子包括但不限于：

杰出學術部門或項目的高級教員或高級研究職位；

杰出非學術機構或公司的高級研究職位；

獲得政府擇優獎勵（如學術研究或小企業創新研究 (SBIR) 基金）的部門、機構或企業的首席或指定研究員；

杰出組織的重要委員會成員；

聲譽卓著的初創企業的創始人或共同創始人，或知識產權貢獻者；以及

在杰出組織或機構或公司的杰出部門中擔任領導或關鍵職務，相關組織或部門的負責人或主要研究人員對此有詳細解釋。

考慮因素：

在評估此類證據時，官員會審查該角色是（或曾經是）領導角色還是關鍵角色。

就領導作用而言，官員要看有關證據是否證明此人是（或曾是）該組織或機構或其某個處或部門的領導人。頭銜以及與之相匹配的適當職責可以幫助確定某個角色實際上是（或曾經是）領導角色。

至于關鍵角色，官員會看是否有證據證明此人對該組織或機構的活動成果或該組織或機構的某個部門的活動成果做出了具有重大意義的貢獻。

如果此人在輔助性角色中的表現是（或曾經是）重要的，則可將其視為關鍵性角色。決定該角色是否（或曾經）重要的因素不是此人的職稱，而是此人在該角色中的表現。

在這一標準中，對個人的領導或關鍵作用的重要性有切身了解的人所寫的信，特別有助于官員作出這一決定，只要這些信包含詳細的證明性信息，具體說明該人在組織、機構、部門或部門中的作用是如何發揮領導或關鍵作用的。經驗證據必須包括雇主的信件。

其次，美國公民與移民服務局（USCIS）會確定此人擔任領導職務或關鍵職務的組織或機構或部門是否享有杰出聲譽。

一個組織或機構的相對規?；驂勖旧聿⒉皇菦Q定性因素，而是要與其他信息一起考慮，以確定是否存在杰出聲譽。評估一個組織或機構聲譽的其他相關因素還包括其客戶群的規?；蛳嚓P的媒體報道。

對于學術部門、項目和機構，官員還可將相關和可信的國家排名以及獲得政府研究基金作為積極因素。

對于初創企業，官員可將該企業從政府實體、風險投資基金、天使投資人或其他此類資助者處獲得與該初創企業所處階段和行業通常獲得的融資輪次相稱的大量資金的證據，作為其杰出聲譽的積極因素。

梅里亞姆-韋伯斯特在線詞典對 "杰出 "的定義是 "以顯赫、杰出或卓越為標志 "或 "與杰出人物相稱"。